<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jepstone.net &#187; vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/category/vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog</link>
	<description>Rants and Raves from South Kingstown, RI</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Just about to give up on Parallels</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/07/18/just-about-to-give-up-on-parallels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/07/18/just-about-to-give-up-on-parallels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jepson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[emulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/07/18/just-about-to-give-up-on-parallels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parallels is driving me nuts. If I try to run Vista, it maxes out the CPU constantly, even in the background. In contrast, I&#8217;ve had two VMware Fusion VMs (Vista and XP) running in the background all morning, and I &#8230; <a href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/07/18/just-about-to-give-up-on-parallels/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.jepstone.net/blog/wpcontent/uploads/2007/07/vmware_does_not_suck.jpg' alt='VMware CPU usage' /></p>
<p>Parallels is driving me nuts. If I try to run Vista, it <a href="http://forum.parallels.com/showthread.php?t=13367&#038;highlight=cpu">maxes out the CPU constantly</a>, even in the background. In contrast, I&#8217;ve had two VMware Fusion VMs (Vista and XP) running in the background all morning, and I <em>forgot they were there</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/07/18/just-about-to-give-up-on-parallels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to Future Self: Causes are Never Obvious</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/03/30/note-to-future-self-causes-are-never-obvious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/03/30/note-to-future-self-causes-are-never-obvious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jepson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/03/30/note-to-future-self-causes-are-never-obvious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I installed Vista under Boot Camp today, and my Mac wouldn&#8217;t boot into Mac OS X afterwards. It was sitting there on the blue screen with the mouse cursor. Of course I blamed it on boot camp at first. I &#8230; <a href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/03/30/note-to-future-self-causes-are-never-obvious/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed Vista under Boot Camp today, and my Mac wouldn&#8217;t boot into Mac OS X afterwards. It was sitting there on the blue screen with the mouse cursor. Of course I blamed it on boot camp at first. I plugged it into Ethernet (wasn&#8217;t getting an Airport connection at this point) and ssh&#8217;d into it from another machine. Turns out it was hanging on this <code>umount /Volumes/Foo</code> that I had stuck into <em>rc.local</em> a long time ago. I have no idea why installing Vista would trigger that behavior, but it&#8217;s gone from that file now and boots up fine. Who do I talk to about getting that hour of my life back? <code> <img src='http://www.jepstone.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/03/30/note-to-future-self-causes-are-never-obvious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Long Are You Willing to Wait for that UAC Prompt to Appear?</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/12/15/how-long-are-you-willing-to-wait-for-that-uac-prompt-to-appear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/12/15/how-long-are-you-willing-to-wait-for-that-uac-prompt-to-appear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jepson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jepstone.net/blog/?p=583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who&#8217;s talked to me about Vista in the past couple of months knows that I&#8217;m impressed with it. And I&#8217;ve even been known to say kind things about how Microsoft cleaned up the User Access Control (UAC) prompts in &#8230; <a href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/12/15/how-long-are-you-willing-to-wait-for-that-uac-prompt-to-appear/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who&#8217;s talked to me about Vista in the past couple of months knows that I&#8217;m impressed with it. And I&#8217;ve even been known to say kind things about how Microsoft cleaned up the User Access Control (UAC) prompts in post-beta versions of Vista. But I read today that an installation package with a lot of digitally signed files can take a long time for the UAC prompt to come up; up to an hour in <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=BB4A75AB-E2D4-4C96-B39D-37BAF6B5B1DC&#038;displaylang=en">this case</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>When installing on Windows Vista with User Account Control (UAC) active, there can be a substantial delay before the initial setup dialog is displayed. During this time, a UAC function is verifying digital signatures within the installation package. This service pack carries a large number of files causing the process to take up to one hour in some cases. </p></blockquote>
<p>This explains a lot, actually. I&#8217;ve run into this exact problem (well, not an hour, but sometimes a few minutes or more), and the result is that I ended up clicking the installer several times wondering WTF is going on. Even if there&#8217;s no quick solution to this problem, Microsoft might want to have some kind of progress indicator explaining what&#8217;s going on. Although it seems sensible to turn off UAC while I&#8217;m installing this package, I&#8217;m going to leave it on and see how long it takes for the prompt to pop up.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: it took only three minutes to appear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/12/15/how-long-are-you-willing-to-wait-for-that-uac-prompt-to-appear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connecting to Samba from Vista RC1</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/09/21/connecting-to-samba-from-vista-rc2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/09/21/connecting-to-samba-from-vista-rc2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jepson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jepstone.net/blog/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the things that is annoying me about Vista is that I can&#8217;t connect to my SMB shares on my Mac. When I try to log in, it rejects my password. I looked at /var/log/samba/log.smbd on my Mac, and &#8230; <a href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/09/21/connecting-to-samba-from-vista-rc2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that is annoying me about Vista is that I can&#8217;t<br />
connect to my SMB shares on my Mac. When I try to log in, it rejects my<br />
password. I looked at /var/log/samba/log.smbd on my Mac, and here&#8217;s<br />
what I saw:</p>
<pre>
[2006/09/21 13:55:45, 1] auth_ods.c:opendirectory_ntlmv2_auth_user(312)
  User "bjepson" failed to authenticate with
"dsAuthMethodStandard:dsAuthNodeNTLMv2" (-14090) <code> <img src='http://www.jepstone.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </code>
</pre>
<p>So I poked around the Group Policy Edit (type gpedit.msc into the<br />
search or address box and press enter). I drilled down into:</p>
<pre>
Local Computer Policy
  -> Computer Configuration
    -> Windows Settings
      -> Security Settings
        -> Local Policies
          -> Security Options
</pre>
<p>and I changed &#8220;Network security: LAN Manager authentication level&#8221; to<br />
&#8220;Send LM &#038; NTLM &#8211; use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated&#8221; and it<br />
seems to work.</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/09/21/connecting-to-samba-from-vista-rc2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Pre-RC1 on MacBook</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/08/30/vista-pre-rc1-on-macbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/08/30/vista-pre-rc1-on-macbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jepson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jepstone.net/blog/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of buzz about the Pre-RC1 build of Vista working with Boot Camp. I decided to give it a try, and it was pretty easy. You&#8217;ll want to perform a full backup before you try this!!! First, &#8230; <a href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/08/30/vista-pre-rc1-on-macbook/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of buzz about the <a href="http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&#038;id=34778">Pre-RC1</a> build of Vista <a href="http://home.mchsi.com/~khadzic/MyWebsite/files/cfc6211606c6ae86a4169400da828a6d-26.html">working with Boot Camp</a>. I decided to give it a try, and it was pretty easy. You&#8217;ll want to perform a full backup before you try this!!! </p>
<ol>
<li>First, run the BootCamp Assistant and delete your Windows installation. This will wipe out all your data, but will restore your Mac to a single partition. You only need to do this if you want to perform the next step.
<li>I&#8217;m pretty sure Vista won&#8217;t run on a FAT32 file system, so you need some way to exchange files between Mac OS X and Windows. I think the best way to do this is to create a third partition. <a href="http://forum.onmac.net/archive/index.php/t-1005.html">This post </a>(read it all) has lots of details on this. On my MacBook with a 100GB drive, I used this command to shrink my Mac partition and create a 5GB partition for shared data and a 20GB partition for Vista:
<pre>
sudo diskutil resizeVolume disk0s2 72842723328B \
"MS-DOS FAT32" Data 5368709120B  \
"MS-DOS FAT32" Windows 21474836480B
</pre>
<li>Next, I rebooted, opened a Terminal, and ran this command to create a FAT32 file system on the Data partition (please check the output of <code>diskutil list /dev/disk0</code> to be sure you are operating on the right partition first or you may wipe out important data!!!):
<pre>
sudo newfs_msdos /dev/disk0s3
</pre>
<li>Once I finished these steps, I inserted the Vista DVD, and rebooted the Mac. I held down the Option key as it was starting, and selected the Vista DVD as the boot media.
<li>I went through the Vista installer as normal, and all was fine. The only oddity was that when it rebooted, it went into Mac OS X. I opened up System Preferences/Startup Disk and told it to boot from the new Windows partition.
<li>I rebooted and setup continued as normal.
</ol>
<p>One drawback of this is that Bootcamp Assistant won&#8217;t run if you have these three partitions, which make it hard for you to burn new driver CDs. However, you should be able to Control-Click on the BootCamp Assistant app, choose Show Package Contents, and find the driver disk .img file that way. I&#8217;m sure there will be other annoyances involved with using a non-standard configuration, so I&#8217;m prepared to have to delete these partitions and start anew at least a few more times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/08/30/vista-pre-rc1-on-macbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP OfficeJet d135 and Vista Beta 2</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/07/09/hp-officejet-d135-and-vista-beta-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/07/09/hp-officejet-d135-and-vista-beta-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jepson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jepstone.net/blog/?p=537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re trying to get an OfficeJet d135 working with Beta 2 of Vista, you&#8217;ll probably get an error when you try to install the driver. If, like me, you did an upgrade installation from a previously-working XP installation, your &#8230; <a href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/07/09/hp-officejet-d135-and-vista-beta-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re trying to get an OfficeJet d135 working with Beta 2 of Vista, you&#8217;ll probably get an error when you try to install the driver. If, like me, you did an upgrade installation from a previously-working XP installation, your printer may just mysteriously stop working.</p>
<p>I found that the DeskJet 990c driver that&#8217;s built into Vista works fine, and handles color as well as the two-sided printing accessory. (If you want to change your driver, open the Control Panel, click Printers under Hardware and Sound, and then right-click on the printer. Instead of choosing Properties, choose Properties from the &#8220;Run Elevated&#8221; sub-menu. Then use the Advanced tab to change the driver).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/07/09/hp-officejet-d135-and-vista-beta-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After the Keynotes</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/01/13/after-the-keynotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/01/13/after-the-keynotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jepson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After all the news coming out of Macworld and CES, I find Iâ€™m thinking less about MacBooks than I am about dual core Intel chips. Over the past few months, my computers have been taking on very specific roles: My &#8230; <a href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/01/13/after-the-keynotes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After all the news coming out of Macworld and CES, I find Iâ€™m thinking less about MacBooks than I am about dual core Intel chips. Over the past few months, my computers have been taking on very specific roles:</p>
<ul>
<li>My Athlon XP system that I <a title="Link outside of this blog" class="blines3" target="_blank" href="http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/buildpc/">built</a> is really my games machine (recently <a title="Link outside of this blog" class="blines3" target="_blank" href="http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/repairpc/">upgraded</a> as cheaply as possible to the minimum requirements of <a title="Link outside of this blog" class="blines3" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-Life_2:_Lost_Coast">Half-Life 2: Lost Coast</a>)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The <a title="Link outside of this blog" class="blines3" target="_blank" href="http://www.jepstone.net/index.cgi/OperatingSystems/Windows/NoMac.html">Dell laptop</a> is more and more becoming my work machine (Word, Thunderbird, OpenOffice 2.0, etc.)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>And my 12â€³ PowerBook spends most of its time plugged into a 20â€³ monitor. I use it for organizing my music, scanning and editing my familyâ€™s slides from the 60s and 70s, and just about anything that has to do with digital media.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now that core duo laptops are appearing everywhere, I have the opportunity to either buy a new Mac, or put that power where I really need it: a Windows notebook that has the muscle I need for gaming and my day-to-day work, and I could retire my current laptop and desktop.</p>
<p>And then thereâ€™s Vistaâ€¦ all these PC laptops coming out seem very much to be Vista-ready, but then again, itâ€™s possible that the MacBook Pro <a title="Link outside of this blog" class="blines3" target="_blank" href="http://www.betanews.com/article/XP_Wont_Run_on_Intel_MacBook_iMac/1137003330">is, as well</a>. So if I wait a little while, maybe I can eliminate the three computers in my office by getting the one that really does everything I<br />
need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2006/01/13/after-the-keynotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

