<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s in the Mac OS X version of Silverlight 1.1 Alpha?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/05/01/whats-in-the-mac-os-x-version-of-silverlight-11-alpha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/05/01/whats-in-the-mac-os-x-version-of-silverlight-11-alpha/</link>
	<description>Rants and Raves from 02881 and 22204</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Jepson</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/05/01/whats-in-the-mac-os-x-version-of-silverlight-11-alpha/#comment-77516</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jepson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/05/01/whats-in-the-mac-os-x-version-of-silverlight-11-alpha/#comment-77516</guid>
		<description>Let me know what you find out. One thing I neglected to mention, although you may already be aware of this, is that even managed code DLLs are supposed look like that. So it is possible that all of those DLLs are managed code and that all the system-specific stuff is in the bundles and executables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me know what you find out. One thing I neglected to mention, although you may already be aware of this, is that even managed code DLLs are supposed look like that. So it is possible that all of those DLLs are managed code and that all the system-specific stuff is in the bundles and executables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augie Fackler</title>
		<link>http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/05/01/whats-in-the-mac-os-x-version-of-silverlight-11-alpha/#comment-77420</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie Fackler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 22:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jepstone.net/blog/2007/05/01/whats-in-the-mac-os-x-version-of-silverlight-11-alpha/#comment-77420</guid>
		<description>16 megs isn't all that large for a universal mach-o binary.
What vexes me more is the fact that System.dll doesn't contain PPC code based on what you've listed here - so maybe the dll's are /only/ managed code? I find it unlikely that they'd be running i386 code on PPC Macs.
You've intruiged me - now I'm going to have to download this and look at the magic they're pulling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16 megs isn&#8217;t all that large for a universal mach-o binary.<br />
What vexes me more is the fact that System.dll doesn&#8217;t contain PPC code based on what you&#8217;ve listed here - so maybe the dll&#8217;s are /only/ managed code? I find it unlikely that they&#8217;d be running i386 code on PPC Macs.<br />
You&#8217;ve intruiged me - now I&#8217;m going to have to download this and look at the magic they&#8217;re pulling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
